Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1950No. 12201PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by Blaze H. Lane ■against Pinkie Smith, seeking to recover the amount of liquidated damages provided for in two contracts in the total sum of $780.00. Defendant, though, served with citation, did not answer and judgment by default in that amount was rendered. From that judgment this appeal has been prosecuted by Pinkie Smith, through the means of a writ of error.

By the terms of the first contract sued on Lane agreed to loan to Smith the sum of $500.00. Smith agreed to seek, permit and provide a suitable place for the operation of Lane’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Methodist Episcopal ChurchTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. McElroy v. DancigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Langever v. United Advertising Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Southern Plow Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Schlag v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Berne v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Johnson Engineers, Inc. v. Tri-Water Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Oetting v. Flake Uniform & Linen Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. University Computing Company v. Leader CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API