Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1937No. 1705PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

Joe Lee Ferguson instituted this suit against A. M. Ferguson to recover $25,000, alleged to be liquidated damages due him as result of the latter’s refusal to abide by the .terms of an arbitration award to which they were parties. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, and he appeals.

Appellant asserts the legal sufficiency of the petition and the appellee attacks it by four counter propositions.

Appellee’s first two propositions are to the effect that the allegations of the appellant’s petition disclose that he elected a remedy by which he…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Collier v. BettertonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Admiral Motor Hotel of Texas, Inc. v. Community Inns of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Werline v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  3. Tejas Development Co. v. McGough Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  4. Zucht v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Johnson v. KornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API