Legal Opinion
Corrugated Fiber Co. v. Paper Working Machines Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Corrugated Fiber Company against the Paper Working Machines Company and another.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIEFD, District Judge.
Suit is brought upon claims 6, 16, and 17 of patent No. 1,179,941, granted April 18, 1916, to Samuel M. Fangs ton, on an application filed September 13, 1915. The invention relates to an improvement in a machine “for making double-faced corrugated paper, and more particularly to the means for applying the second facing sheet to a corrugated sheet which already has a facing sheet upon the opposite surface.”
The art, which is of comparatively recent development, has to do with the making of paper board with a smooth outer surface on each side, and with a center composed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Atlas Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Corrugated Paper Patents Co. v. Paper Working Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. City of AmsterdamDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
- Peter Heibel & Sons Planing Mill & Mfg. Co. v. Corrugated Paper Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Matthews v. Allen Matthews v. Koolvent Metal Awning Co. Of Winston-Salem, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Royal-Eastern Electrical Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Andrus v. WhitmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
- Autokraft Box Corp. v. Nu-Box Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936