Legal Opinion
Otis-Wisher v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 25, 2013No. 1:11-cv-64-jgmPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MEDTRONIC DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
(Docs. 55, 58)
J. GARVAN MURTHA, District Judge.
I. Introduction
In this diversity action commenced in March 2011, Plaintiff Koleen Otis-Wisher (“Otis-Wisher” or “Plaintiff’) asserts a variety of common-law tort and consumer fraud claims against Defendants Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc. (“Fletcher Allen”), Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamar Danek USA, Inc. (“Medtronic”). (Doc. 35 (“Compl.”).) The claims arise from Otis-Wisher’s spinal surgery at Fletcher Allen on March 27, 2008. She initially filed suit against Fletcher Allen alleging only…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ramirez v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Otis-Wisher v. Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Scovil v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Blankenship v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Alton v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.