Legal Opinion

Washington Cranberry Growers Ass'n v. Moore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1921No. 16418PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Hewen, J., entered December 18, 1920, in favor of the plaintiff:, in an action for an injunction, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to restrain the breach- of a contract. The trial resulted in a permanent injunction, from which the defendant appeals.

*431The Washington Cranberry Association is a corporation organized under the laws of this state and is engaged in the business of marketing cranberries for those with whom it has contracts, and in some instances for independent growers. The appellant had entered into a contract with the corporation by which he agreed to deliver to it all the cranberries grown by him in Pacific county on land owned by him. The contract provides as follows:

“Witnesseth:…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Santa Clara Valley Mill and Lumber Co. v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ropes v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Harris v. TheusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. McKeever v. Washington Heights Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Chas. Uhden, Inc. v. GreenoughWashington Supreme Court · 1935

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API