State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
I
This case presents the question whether defendants’ 1 constitutional rights of free speech and due process of law, guaranteed by both federal and state constitutions, are infringed by Minn.Stat. §§ 181.75-.76 (1980). Section 181.75 prohibits employers and their agents from “directly or indirectly solicit[ing] or requir[ing]” their employees or prospective employees to take a “polygraph, voice stress analysis, or any test purporting to test [their] honesty.” 2 " 3 It also prohibits persons who sell, administer, or interpret such tests from doing so when they know…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Steven Calvit v. Minneapolis Public Schools Four Winds School Donna GrantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. MacHholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Casino Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.