State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in Judge (now Justice) Handler’s opinion. 138 N. J. Super. 23 (1975).
We agree with the conclusion of the Appellate Division that the three instruments executed and delivered respectively by Bakers Basin Realty Co., John and Jane Kaehmar, and John and Janina Zagorzycki, as sellers, and *105Cortshire Development Corp. as purchaser should be treated as contracts of sale rather than as options. This makes it unnecessary for us to reconsider our earlier holding in State v. New Jersey Zinc Co., 40 N. J. 560, 576-77…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- County of Monmouth v. HiltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Union County Imp. Auth. v. ArtakiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- American Combustion, Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.