Legal Opinion

Michael Friedman v. Kathleen Sebelius

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 27, 2012No. 15-1015PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court by Senior Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

*816Opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part, and dissenting from the judgment filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE.

Opinion dissenting in part, concurring in part, and concurring in the judgment filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge:

Michael Friedman, Paul Goldenheim, and Howard Udell were executives at the Purdue Frederick Company when it misbranded a drug, to wit, the painkiller Oxy-Contin, a schedule II controlled substance. The Company was convicted of fraudulent misbranding, a felony, whilst the executives…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Nicholas SlattenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Collins v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Gumpad v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API