Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 20, 2001No. 2000-413-C.APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The defendant, Vincent P. Murray, appeals from the denial of his Rule 35 motion to correct an illegal sentence. Murray had been convicted on two counts of second-degree child molestation. He received concurrent sentences of fifteen years on each count, six of which were to be served with the remaining nine years being suspended, and with probation on each count. His convictions were affirmed by this Court in State v. Murray, 726 A.2d 467 (R.I.1999) (mem.).

This appeal came before a single justice of this Court, who ordered the parties to show cause why it should not be summarily decided.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OliveiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  2. Frazier v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TexieiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. State v. DeCiantisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. State v. LindeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Hay v. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. State v. BouffardSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API