Legal Opinion
Baumann v. Darhogopian, No. Cv 90 0267203 S (May 20, 1991)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 20, 1991No. CV 90 0267203 SUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (#111) The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the defendant violated several vehicular statutes and caused a collision that severely injured the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks double or treble money damages pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat.14-295.
The defendant filed a motion to strike the claim for double or treble damages, arguing that 14-295 could not be applied retroactively. The collision occurred March 23, 1988, after the prior version of 14-295 was declared…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Massa v. NastriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Bishop v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.