Legal Opinion

In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 19, 1990No. 87 C 33PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICKERSON, District Judge.

This consolidated action was the subject of a Memorandum and Order, dated December 30, 1988, published Bernstein v. Crazy Eddie, Inc., 702 F.Supp. 962 (E.D.N.Y.1988), vacated in part on other grounds, 714 F.Supp. 1285 (E.D.N.Y.1989), familiarity with which is assumed.

The present matter concerns the claims of the shareholder plaintiffs (plaintiffs) against Peat Marwick Main & Co. (Peat Marwick), and its third party claims against others.

Plaintiffs’ claims against Peat Marwick allege violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bernstein v. Crazy Eddie, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. In Re Crazy Eddie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  3. Fromer v. YogelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. In Re Crazy Eddie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  5. Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC v. Intershop Communications AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API