Legal Opinion
In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 11, 1993No. CV 87-0033, CV 90-3181 and CV 91-4450PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge:
These cases arise from the alleged fraudulent and negligent conduct of defendant Eddie Antar (Antar) and his relatives and the officers, directors, auditors, underwriters, employees and vendors of the consumer retailer Crazy Eddie, Inc. (Crazy Eddie) (now in bankruptcy). The parties (except Antar) have reached and informed the class plaintiffs of a proposed settlement.
Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure class plaintiffs move for an order approving the proposed settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate, and for an award of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Cullen v. Whitman Medical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- In re Frontier Insurance Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.