Schnack v. Applied Arts Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
August 18, 1934, defendant entered into a written contract with, plaintiff, a copy of which is annexed hereto. * March 13, 1936, plaintiff filed a bill of complaint against defendant for an account ing, payment to Mm of the amount found due upon such accounting, and other relief. Defendant answered, admitting it had refused to pay royalties and sought to justify nonpayment, claiming the contract had been violated by plaintiff, it had been de ceived and defrauded into mailing it, and it was without consideration. Defendant asked, hy way of cross-bill, that plaintiff be required to pay it the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strong v. Carver Cotton Gin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Hall Manufacturing Co. v. American Railway Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Bancroft v. Union Embossing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
- Forncrook Manufacturing Co. v. E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin Stamping & Stove Co. v. ManleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1931
- Davis Co. v. Burnsville Hosiery Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Louise W. Gesing and St. Stanislaus Novitiate of Parma, Ohio v. Grand Rapids Hardware Company and Detroit Hardware Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Sunday v. Novi Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939