Forncrook Manufacturing Co. v. E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron Works
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
The only question in this case is whether a case was made by the defendant for removal to the Federal court. The Superior Court entered an order for removal, and error is brought upon that order.
The declaration in substance alleges that on December 23, *5541882, plaintiff was the owner of two letters patent, one dated February 11, 1879, and the other March 22, 1881, issued by the United States to Isaac S. Forncrook, plaintiff’s assignor, for certain improvements in cheese-safes-: that then and for several years previous plaintiff and its assignor had been extensively engaged in manufacturing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Eureka Company v. Bailey CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Trafton v. NouguesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1877
- Hall Manufacturing Co. v. American Railway Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Jones v. BurnhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Schnack v. Applied Arts Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Rubsam Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Smith v. AyraultMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Ewert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914