Hall Manufacturing Co. v. American Railway Supply Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Grand Rapids. AssuMPsrr. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation organized under the act approved May 1st, 1875, providing for the incorporation of manufacturing companies, entered into an agreement with the defendant giving the latter the sole and exclusive license and right to manufacture and sell a certain patent rail upon a royalty to be paid therefor. The defendant manufactured and sold a certain number of tons and this *333action is brought to recover the royalty due therefor. The defendant alleges that the contract was one the plaintiff had no authority to enter into as it thereby abdicated a specific corporate function for…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Shadford v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Rhodes v. AshurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Forncrook Manufacturing Co. v. E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Schnack v. Applied Arts Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.