Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 2004No. A03-110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction for felony theft, arguing that the state’s evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the district court abused its discretion in ruling that appellant’s three prior burglary convictions could be used for impeachment. Appellant also argues that his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial was violated when the district court imposed a sentence that was an upward durational departure under the career-offender statute, because the sentencing judge, not a jury, found that appellant had five or more prior felony convictions…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. State v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API