Legal Opinion

Koppers Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1953No. 78-52PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

Plaintiff sues to recover $273,143.19, plus interest, claiming that such amount represents an illegal collection and overpayment of interest on “potential” excess profits tax deficiencies of $199,854.52 and $330,981.62 for the years 1940 and 1941, respectively. These “potential” deficiencies, which, under the law and the facts of plaintiff’s case for the years involved, the plaintiff was never required to pay, and which, at the time they were computed could not be legally collected, represent the amounts of excess profits tax which plaintiff would have been required to pay had it not been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Rodgers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Henry River Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Koppers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. McMahonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. United States v. Premier Oil Refining Co. Of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Hastings & Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API