Henry River Mills Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge
This is a suit to recover interest on an alleged deficiency in excess profits tax for the fiscal year 1942. Plaintiff contends that no deficiency ever existed and that such interest was illegally collected. Defendant claims that there was an underpayment but for the relief provisions of section 722 of the Internal Revenue Code and that, therefore, the interest was properly collected for the period prior to the granting of the relief.
The facts are stipulated and are not in dispute. They are set out in an agreed statement signed by representatives of both parties. The facts so stipulated are…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Koppers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Premium Oil Refining Co. of Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1952
- Hastings & Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Kuder Citrus Pulp Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1953