Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1952No. 50311PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s petition sets forth a claim for refund of an amount allegedly wrongfully collected from plaintiff by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue as interest upon a deficiency in plaintiff’s income tax for the year 1944.

Subsequent to defendant’s answer plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendant thereafter amended its answer and filed a motion for summary judgment, together with affidavits in support of the motion. The material facts are not in dispute and plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions both present the same questions of law.

Plaintiff’s income…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1952
  3. Henry River Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Auerbach Shoe Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. United States v. Koppers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) v. Denis J. McMahon Individually and as District Director of Internal Revenue, Lower ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Hankins Ex Rel. Hankins v. DerbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Hastings & Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API