Legal Opinion
State v. Reha
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 7, 1991No. CX-90-2372PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Theora Reha challenges the constitutionality of Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 244.690 (1985), which requires occupants to keep their dwellings in “clean and sanitary condition”. Because the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague as applied to Reha, we reverse her conviction.
FACTS
Following a Minneapolis Health Department inspection of her home, Theora Reha was charged with violating Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 244.690, which requires dwellings to be kept in “a clean and sanitary condition.” At trial, a Minneapolis Health Department inspector…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hafez v. City of SchenectadyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State, City of Minneapolis v. RehaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992