Legal Opinion
State, City of Minneapolis v. Reha
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 24, 1992No. CX-90-2372Published
1Opinion of the Court
483 N.W.2d 688 (1992)
STATE of Minnesota, CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
Theora REHA, Respondent.
No. CX-90-2372.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 24, 1992.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Robert J. Alfton, Minneapolis City Atty., and William J. Korn, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for appellant.
Stan Nathanson, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Gloria R. Mitka, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for amicus curiae, Bldg. Officials & Admin. Inter., Inc.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
YETKA, Justice.
This case involves the constitutionality of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.