Legal Opinion
State v. Ellis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 1991No. C0-90-2512PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant claims Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 244.500 (1982) and § 244.530 (1985), are unconstitutionally vague on their face and as applied. He also contends Minneapolis, Minn.Code of Ordinances § 87.90(f) (1978) does not make it a crime to fail to comply with a written order under the Minneapolis Housing Maintenance Code. Further, he argues he was denied a fair trial and the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Andrew Ellis was employed by the City of Minneapolis Inspections Department as an inspector from 1969…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996