Legal Opinion
Thurston v. Setab Computer Institute
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 25, 1969No. 69 Civ. 1425PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendants Radio Corporation of America and International Business Machines Corporation move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (6), 12(h) (2) to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), 9(b). A substantially similar motion made by de*135fendants Setab Computer Institute, the Chase Manhattan Bank and the New York State Department of Education has been granted by order of Judge Edward C. McLean of this court. Thurston v. Setab Computer Institute et al., 69 Civ.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Huey v. BarlogaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Richard D. Austin v. The House of Vision, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Jules Michael v. Clark Equipment Company, Clark Leasing Corporation and Clark Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Bound Brook Water Company v. JaffeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Car-Freshner Corp. v. Auto Aid Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. ClintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Reaemco, Inc. v. Allegheny AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- International Bank v. Banco de Economias y PrestamosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
- Danning v. Lum's, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.