Legal Opinion

Huey v. Barloga

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 27, 1967No. 67 C 906PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings this action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986, seeking the recovery of damages for the death of his son, Jerome Huey. Plaintiff is the legal representative of the deceased. The defendants were the trustees, employees, and agents of the Town of Cicero, Illinois, at the time of Jerome Huey’s death. All the parties are citizens of Illinois and jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. Pursuant to Rulé 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendants have filed a motion to dismiss contending (1) the court…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Thomas Byrd v. William P. BrishkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. White v. RochfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. A. D. Granville v. W. B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API