Legal Opinion

Westside Business Park, L.L.C. v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 3, 2000No. 24259-1-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, C.J.

— Pierce County appeals the superior court’s affirmance of a hearing examiner’s decision that Westside Business Park’s (Westside) completed short plat application, which did not reveal the proposed use, vested under the water drainage ordinances in effect when the application was filed. Because the County knew of the intended use and accepted the application as complete, we hold that vesting occurred. We affirm.

The material facts in this case are undisputed. On September 11,1997, Westside met with Pierce County Planning and Land Services for a predevelopment conference. In this meeting,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Miller v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Westside Business Park, LLC v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Miller v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API