Legal Opinion
Duma v. Unum Provident
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2011No. Civil Action 08-0581 (PLF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for rescission or, in the alternative, for reformation of the voluntary dismissal of her claims against defendant Unum Provident. Upon consideration of the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will deny plaintiffs motion. 1
I. BACKGROUND
On April 4, 2008, plaintiff Khadija Duma filed this action pro se against defendants Unum Provident, Fannie Mae, and three individually named defendants, “asserting a broad panoply of claims under the Employment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Wright v. Foreign Service Grievance BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Taitz v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Green v. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (Afl-Cio)District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Duma v. Unum ProvidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- In re Black Farmers Discrimination LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Keister v. Aarp Benefits CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.