Legal Opinion

Duma v. Unum Provident

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-0581 (PLF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff, Khadija Duma, for relief from final judgment' and for a writ of error comm nobis. Upon consideration of Ms. -Duma’s papers, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will deny her motion and her *2writ of error.1

I. BACKGROUND

On April 4, 2008, Ms. Duma filed this action pro se against defendants Unum Provident, Fannie Mae, and three individually named defendants, “asserting a broad panoply of claims under the Employment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Smalls, Eugene C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility v. United States Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Sawyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minter v. UnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
  2. Nabaya v. LauckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API