Legal Opinion

Breiholz v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 10, 1919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

- Appeal from Pocahontas District Gourt. — D. F. Coyle, Judge. Action in. equity for the cancellation of assessments levied upon the lands of the plaintiffs for the alleged expense or cost of maintenance, cleaning, and repairing of certain drainage ditches. On trial, the district court dismissed the bill, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J..Much is said in the pleadings that is not necessary to an understanding of the issues in this case. Briefly stated, it is conceded, or shown without controversy, that, in the year 1907, a drainage district known as “No. 29” was established in Pocahontas County, and the district was improved by the construction of a drainage system composed of a certain main, with other laterals or branches. While some of these drains were of the closed or tile pattern, a large proportion thereof was open. In the year 1910, the engineer in charge of the district reported to the board of supervisors…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lade v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Haugen v. Humboldt-Kossuth Joint Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Walker v. Joint Drainage District No. 2 of Osceola & Dickinson CountiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Nervig v. Joint Boards of Supervisors of Polk & Story CountriesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Board of Trustees of Monona-Harrison Drainage District No. 1 v. Board of Supervisors of Monona CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API