Lade v. Board of Supervisors
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hancoch District Court. — C. H. Kelley, Judge. Suit in equity, to cancel an assessment with which it is sought to charge the appellees upon the claim that a drainage ditch has been cleaned and repaired. The claim is that what was done was not cleaning and repairing, but an unauthorized widening and deepening of such drainage ditch. The trial court cancelled the assessment.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
1. Drains : “,deepening of ^cieaSing ana repairing.” I. This record has 121 pages of abstract, a 75-page amendment on part of appellee, and a second amendment on his part. The original arguments have 70 pages, and there is a supplemental argument by appellee and an objection to its being considered, which j ° ' -includes a reply thereto. A most laborious investigation of all these has satisfied us reaj controversy is very narrow, and *1028it is to be regretted this could not be known until the exháustive investigation of this record was finished.
The defendant board of supervisors axithorized the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wingert v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Winzer v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Voogd v. JOINT DRAIN. DIST., KOSSUTH & WINNEBAGO COS.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Breiholz v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Haugen v. Humboldt-Kossuth Joint Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Kelleher v. Joint Drainage District No. 18Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Voogd v. JOINT DRAIN. DIST., KOSSUTH & WINNEBAGO COS.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971