Legal Opinion
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 21, 2012No. Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHKPublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF DISPOSITIVE MATTER REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Samsung moves for relief from portions of Magistrate Judge Grewal’s July 24, 2012 Order Granting-in-Part Apple’s Motion for an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction. See ECF No. 1321, 881 F.Supp.2d 1132, 2012 WL 3042943 (N.D.Cal.2012) (“Adverse Inference Order”); ECF No. 1392 (“Motion”). Apple filed an opposition, ECF No. 1531 (“Opp’n”); Samsung filed a reply, ECF No.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Lofton v. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Compass Bank v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.