Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Raines

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 10, 1958No. 5-1397PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CarletoN Harris, Chief Justice.

Appellee, E. E. Raines, Jr., instituted suit against Robert L. Hardy, appellant herein, alleging that Hardy alienated the affections of Mary H. Raines, wife of appellee, and asking actual damages in the sum of $200,000, and punitive damages in the sum of $50,000. Upon trial of the case, the jury returned a verdict for $65,000. Prom such judgment comes this appeal.

Appellant relies upon five points for reversal, it first being contended that the cou^t erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of appellee’s case. The law applicable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paulson v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hammond v. PedenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. ZolliecofferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Taylor v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Griffin Grocery Co. v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joseph A. Orlando and Anna L. Orlando v. Tony Alamo, Susan Alamo and the Tony and Susan Alamo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Porter v. LincolnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Miller v. Tony and Susan Alamo FoundationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API