Legal Opinion
Joseph A. Orlando and Anna L. Orlando v. Tony Alamo, Susan Alamo and the Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1981No. 80-1166PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Joseph A. Orlando and Anna L. Orlando, brought suit against appellees, Tony Alamo, Susan Alamo and The Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation (Alamo Foundation). Jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Appellees filed a motion to dismiss, contending that (1) the complaint failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted and (2) appellants’ claims were barred by the statute of limitations. This motion was granted and an order entered accordingly. Appellants challenge that order and we affirm.
In substance appellants make the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- MBM Co., Inc. v. CounceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Hiland Dairy, Inc., Reiss Dairy, Inc., and Sunny Hill Farms Dairy Company, Inc. v. The Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Burton v. TribbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Mrs. Jewell Schenebeck and Russell Schenebeck v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Williams v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Beverly Lucas v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.