Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Eby

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 2001PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 This direct appeal has been taken from the judgment of sentence to serve a term of imprisonment of from six months to eighteen months, imposed after appellant, David Eby, pleaded guilty to the offense of possession with intent to deliver marijuana. We are constrained to vacate and remand for resentencing.

¶2 The trial judge has aptly summarized the facts underlying this appeal:

The facts underlying the plea [of guilty to one count of possession with intent to deliver marijuana] are that the defendant was called by a friend, a confidential informant, to supply her with marijuana and he went…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. SaranchakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API