Legal Opinion
Rayner v. Reeves (Reeves)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2012No. 11-1574UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Arthur James Reeves appeals an order of the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) denying his motion for extension of time to a file a notice of appeal. We affirm.
I
This appeal arises out of a proceeding brought in 2009 by Lawrence Rayner and Sally Rayner (the “Rayners”) against Reeves to establish the non-dischargeability of two debts. Since 2001, the parties have been involved in lengthy civil litigation in Wisconsin state court concerning construction work Reeves had performed on the Rayners’ home. Because of the parties’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Miller v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Lang v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Nugent v. Betacom of Phoenix, Inc. (In Re Betacom of Phoenix, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lovelace v. Higgins (In Re Higgins)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Webster Capital Finance, Inc. v. Ottawa Bus Service, Inc. (In re Ottawa Bus Service, Inc.)District Court, D. Kansas · 2013