Hinckley & Schmitt v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn
Jacob Mueller made application for adjustment of a claim against Hinckley & Schmidt, (herein referred to as petitioner,) claiming compensation for accidental injury suffered in the course of his employment. The accident took place September 8, 1942. The arbitrator decided the issues in favor of Mueller, (herein referred to as respondent,) which was confirmed on petition for review, with an increase in the amount of the award, and upon certiorari confirmed by the circuit court of Cook county.
The facts in the case are undisputed, but it is contended by petitioner that such facts show the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Puttkammer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Irwin-Neisler & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Payne & Dolan v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Northwestern Yeast Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Chapman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Northwestern University v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.