Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1945No. 28300. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

The defendant in error, Edward Homan, was employed by the city of Chicago in the capacity of a license investigator. He worked in the loop district of Chicago from Washington to Van Burén streets, and from Clark street to Michigan avenue. It was his job to canvass all places of business and individuals in that district requiring a city license, and customarily he went from place to place walking the sidewalks. February 2, 1942, he had reported at the office for work, and was proceeding to his territory in the morning, going east on Jackson boulevard, and, after crossing Dearborn street, he…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Illinois Publishing & Printing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Puttkammer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Irwin-Neisler & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bommarito v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Hayes v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API