State v. Manning
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
The State appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained during a special inquiry judge proceeding. We affirm.
Defendants were arrested and charged in district court with professional gambling in violation of RCW 9.46.220. Following a preliminary appearance they were released, one on bail, the other on recognizance. Approximately 45 days later the prosecutor instituted a special inquiry judge proceeding pursuant to RCW 10.27.170. The special inquiry proceeding was directed solely at the named defendants to obtain additional information to support the charges previously filed against them.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- People v. BirchMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. NeslundWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In re Special Inquiry JudgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.