Legal Opinion
Darst v. Mathieson Alkali Works
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia
Decided October 31, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul, District Judge
(charging jury). This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant company to recover damages resulting from the wrongful discharge of the plaintiff from the service of the defendant company. The declaration is as follows:
*285“10. A. Darst. plaintiff in this canse, who is a citizen of the state of Ohio, complains of the Mathieson Alkali Works, a corporation under the laws of, and a citizen of, the state of Virginia, defendant, being summoned of a plea of trespass on the case, for that heretofore, to wit, on the 21th day of July, 380.’). at' Saltville, in fixe state of Virginia, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gordon v. BrewsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Emerson v. HowlandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1816
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pasquel v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Nagel v. KrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Greene v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Lubriko Co. v. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Ross v. Grand Pants Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.