Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Howland

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided May 15, 1816No. Case No. 4,441PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STORY, Circuit Justice.

In future, where seamen are discharged in a foreign port, I shall decree against the owners the whole of the three months’ wages authorized and required to be paid by the statute of the 28th of February, 1803 (chapter 02). The practice has heretofore been to allow only the two months’ wages, which belong to the mariner. But the owner ought not to be in a better situation than if he had complied with the terms of the law; and it is the duty of the court to see, that it is enforced. The additional month’s wages will not, however, be paid over to the mariner, but retained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. WildfireNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Brooks v. DorrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  3. Ward v. AmesNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  4. Sullivan v. MorganNew York Supreme Court · 1814

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Darst v. Mathieson Alkali WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896
  2. Oxnard v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Swift v. The Frank & WillieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1891
  4. Worth v. Steam-Boat Lioness No 2.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1880
  5. Grant v. Steamboat Maria DenningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API