Kennedy v. Brown
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit, Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
The plaintiffs recovered judgment before a justice upon oral pleadings. The justice entered the substance of the declaration in these terms: Plaintiffs declared
orally on the common counts in assumpsit, and specially for a surplus in the hands of defendant arising from the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by Calista Nevius to the said defendant, dated April 18,1879, which surplus has been duly assigned to the plaintiffs in this cause, and which said defendant refuses to pay, to plaintiffs’ damage $300.”
An appeal was taken, and on the 15th of March, 1882, the case was heard without a jury and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State Bank of Florence v. Miller (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Johnson v. DayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
- Owen v. Estate of BaxterMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Roberge v. CyrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.