Legal Opinion

Roberge v. Cyr

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

1. “A mortgagee selling under a power contained in a mortgage may be a purchaser at the sale, unless the mortgage contains a provision to the contrary.” P. L., c. 215, s. 25. So far as appears, there was no such provision in the defendants’ mortgage.

It has been repeatedly held that the purchaser at a foreclosure sale enters into a binding contract which cannot be modified or annulled except under such circumstances as would justify its reformation or rescission within the technical meaning of these terms. 3 Jones, Mortgages (8th ed.), 601, and cases cited. Nor is the rule otherwise where the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shear v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
  2. Fagan v. People's Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Perkins v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Kennedy v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Johnson v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. L. M. Sullivan Co. v. Essex Broadway Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Phinney v. Cheshire County Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API