Legal Opinion

Carrow v. Bayliner Marine Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1989No. 3-88-262-CVPublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

This is a Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) suit brought by appellants, George Carrow and Joan Carrow, against appel-lees, Bayliner Marine Corporation (Bayliner) and Aqualand, Inc. (Aqualand), for misrepresentations and unconscionable actions surrounding the sale of a motoryacht. The jury rendered a verdict for the Carrows against Bayliner and Aqualand, but found no damages against Aqualand. On that basis, the trial court rendered a take-nothing judgment as to the Carrows’ claim against Aqualand. The trial court disregarded three of six damage findings against Bayliner and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KeilmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Cruz v. Andrews Restoration, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Nelson v. Najm, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. Humphrey v. Camelot Retirement Community, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  5. Powell Electrical Systems, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API