Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Pierce

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.

On the 10th of May, 1847, McKinney and Pierce entered into a written contract, for the purpose of selling goods and merchandise, which reads as follows:

“Articles of agreement made and entered into by and between Henry Pierce of Grant county, and Daniel Robertson McKinney of Wabash county, both of the state of Indiana. The said Pierce agrees to furnish said McKinney with a common stock of goods or merchandise, delivered in Wabash county, Indiana. The said McKinney, on Ms part, agrees to furnish himself as a hand to take charge of the stock of goods, keep all books and accounts, sell and buy to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenman v. PattisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bremmerman v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Indiana Central Railway Co. v. BradleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Stanton v. State ex rel. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Doak-Riddle-Hamilton Co. v. RaabeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API