Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Doe

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 4, 1992No. 92-1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Agents of the federal government, in the course of conducting court-authorized electronic surveillance during a criminal investigation, intercepted communications which involved the appellant. The appellant later was called to testify before a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Massachusetts. He refused to do so, citing his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The government applied for and received a court order directing the appellant to testify and prohibiting the government from using his testimony or its fruits against him in a criminal prosecution. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. In Re Barbara Lochiatto, in Re Patrick Lochiatto, in Re John E. DunnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. In Re: v. Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API