Legal Opinion

United States v. Torres

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1990No. Nos. 89-30006, 89-30013, 89-30016, 89-30019 and 89-30020PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

This opinion consolidates the appeals brought by Rudy Torres, Mary Torres, Ralph Vickers and Theodore Vickers to their convictions in, respectively, United States v. Torres, No. 89-30006, (Torres I), United States v. Torres, No. 89-30016 (Torres II); United States v. Vickers, No. 89-30019 (Vickers I); and United States v. Vickers, No. 89-30013 (Vickers II). All the appellants contend that the district court should have suppressed the evidence obtained through a wire intercept because the application and affidavit submitted to obtain the wire intercept order, and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. Zulquarnan KhanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 527, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8949 United States of America v. John Jario Gil, United States of America v. Daniel MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API