Legal Opinion

Baker v. Boren

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1997No. 22173PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This case involves a contract dispute which arose from a remodeling project that Kenneth P. Baker and Michael Solis, d/b/a K.B. Industries (K.B.), performed on a residential home, located in Boise, for Bruce and Dawneeta Boren (the Borens). 1 K.B. filed this action claiming that the Borens breached their contract by refusing to pay K.B. in full once substantial performance had been completed. The district court held in favor of K.B. and ruled that the Borens owed K.B. $1,475 in damages. The Borens appeal, and K.B. cross-appeals. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. 20th Century Wear, Inc., Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sanmark-Stardust Inc. And Domino Industries, Inc., Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Anthony Baratta, Samuel Monastersky, and Rocco SancinellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. General Auto Parts Co. v. Genuine Parts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thomson v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MasonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Parkwest Homes v. Julie G. BarnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. David Leon JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API