Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Baratta, Samuel Monastersky, and Rocco Sancinella
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 12, 1968No. 31744_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIGNOUX, District Judge:
Appellants Anthony Baratta, Samuel Monastersky and Rocco Sancinella here appeal their convictions of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174 (1964) relating to the unlawful importation and distribution of narcotics. 1 The indictment was in two counts. The first count charged each appellant with conspiracy to violate the above-mentioned statutes, such a conspiracy being specifically made illegal by section 174. The second count alleged that each appellant was guilty of a substantive violation of these sections as well. 2 All three appellants were convicted on both counts…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Anthony PalumboCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- 20th Century Wear, Inc., Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sanmark-Stardust Inc. And Domino Industries, Inc., Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.