Legal Opinion

Powell Products, Inc. v. Marks

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 17, 1996No. Civil Action 95-B-554 (Consol. with 95-B-982)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ■& ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendants have filed four separate motions for summary judgment on claims against particular defendants. Plaintiff opposes all four motions. The following claims are at issue in the summary judgment motions:

1. Misappropriation of trade secrets against David Wormser, Steve Wormser, and Frederick Marks II;

2. Unfair competition against all defen- . dants except Frederick Marks III (Trey Marks);

3. Interference with existing and prospective business relations against all defendants;

4. Conversion against all defendants except Trey Marks;

5. Civil…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Frantz v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. Coca Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hertz v. Luzenac GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API