Legal Opinion
Hertz v. Luzenac Group
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 11, 2009No. 06-1324, 06-1358PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a series of claims and counterclaims between Luzenac America, Inc. (“Luzenac”) and two of its former employees, Sanford Lee Hertz and Lane Lighthart. In response to Mr. Hertz’s complaint, Luzenac alleged that Mr. Hertz and Mr. Lighthart misappropriated the company’s trade secrets related to the production and marketing of vinyl silane-coated talc. Luzenac also brought related claims for breach of contract and conspiracy. Mr. Hertz, in turn, filed claims against Luzenac for tortious interference with contract and with prospective business…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Jenkins v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Grossman v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Wilkerson v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Shields v. Professional Bureau of Collections of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Storagecraft Technology Corp. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.