Legal Opinion

Schmittinger v. Grogan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1961No. Appeals, 351 and 352PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

Plaintiffs-appellants, Isabel and Francis L. Sehmittinger brought an action against defendant Edward Grogan for damages arising out of an automobile accident. The Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Insurance Company), which had issued a policy covering the defendant, by their attorney, entered an appearance on his behalf. Subsequently, that attorney filed a petition and rule with the court below for permission to withdraw his appearance citing the defendant’s continued failure to cooperate with the Insurance Company in the defense of the suit and the alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Zenner v. Goetz (Travelers Ind. Co.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cohen AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. CNA Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Kraynick v. Nationwide Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Hernandez v. JAPORT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Cornett v. Curd, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1981
  5. Cornett v. Curd, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API